Tuesday 29 January 2019

Little Red Riding Hood: the real story

Of all the folk tales that the Middle Ages has bequeathed to us, and even further back, that of Little Red Riding Hood is that it has suffered the most severe mutilations from commentators, compilers and, of course, the icy and abstruse Walt Disney.

The story, until the scene where the wolf is dressed in the clothes of the grandmother, is more or less the same as the medieval children knew. The differences are given from this point. But first let's review a bit of history.

The first compiler to rescue the story of Little Red Riding Hood was Charles Perrault, who included it in his anthology of popular stories in 1697. Contrary to what happens with other traditional stories, such as Sleeping Beauty or Hansel and Gretel, Little Red Riding Hood was not a story very widespread in Europe. Moreover, it was known in a fairly closed area, ranging from the north of the Alps to the Loire region. In 1812 the Brothers Grimm rewrote history, especially the end, and that is the version that is known today; a version, incidentally, very different from the real Red Riding Hood.

It is not surprising that the Brothers Grimm have modified the original story, the strange thing is that they have been based on a dark work by Ludwig Tieck called Life and Death of the Little Red Riding Hood (Leben und Tod des kleinen Rotkäppchen); tragedy that includes the presence of the woodcutter, absent in the popular story.

Perhaps not to scare away the fearful parents of the early nineteenth century, the Brothers Grimm eliminated all the erotic elements of the story and planted a happy ending, in addition to sweeping everything that does not support the purity and innocence of Little Red Riding Hood. The summary: the end of the story in the version of Jabob and Wilhelm Grimm are saved absolutely all, except the wolf, of course; whose guts are opened by the skillful woodcutter, returning the grandmother to her daily routine.

Let's go to an analysis of the story.

According to Aarne-Thompson's classification of folktales, Little Red Riding Hood enters the category 333, that is, stories that present a supernatural opponent. It is important that we erase from our minds the idea that folktales served as a warning to children about the dangers of the forest, for that a good reprimand was enough. Folk tales have another function, much more important for the people than the peoples have understood. As we see it today, the protagonist of Little Red Riding Hood is, clearly, Little Red Riding Hood, but this is not the case. The mistake, if you can call it that, is Disney's insistence on achieving children's empathy with history. Essentially, Little Red Riding Hood is an important character, a trigger through which the real tragedy happens, but by no means is it the only one. There are even very old versions in which it is mentioned in passing, like that traditional Italian tale called La finta nona, that is, La Falsa Abuela, in which case the young Little Red Riding Hood is an almost decorative element.

The true story of Little Red Riding Hood holds two central elements:

1) The taboo of cannibalism.
2) The embers of the old Nordic religion.

Little Red Riding Hood, Rotkäppchen, Little Red Cap, Le Petit Chaperon Rouge, Little Red Riding Hood, are variables of this trigger. If we had access to some extravagant time machine, and we could witness the storyline of Little Red Riding Hood first-hand, we would hear a completely different story from the one we know. There, the wolf would swallow the old woman, as she does today, but leave on the table a juicy banquet made with the flesh and blood of the grandmother, which the innocent Little Red Riding Hood devours voraciously, perhaps intuiting its illicit origin. Then, dressed in the clothes of the occide, and after a dialogue with many variants, the wolf would pass to taste the trembling flesh of Little Red Riding Hood; moment in which a hunter, who hears the heartrending cries of the young woman, enters the room, kills the wolf and opens the stomach with a knife, returning the young woman to the world of the living.

Now, this death and rebirth of Little Red Riding Hood speaks to us about something very old in the human race: the rite of initiation.

Little Red Riding Hood in the forest, in the house and in the stomach of the wolf, are symbols of the three phases of initiation into adulthood; by which a girl leaves her home-mother, community, civilization-runs through a wilderness-the forest-faces the most sinister of the human heart-cannibalism, anthropophagy-and defeats the worst of the enemies in the womb of the wolf - death.

But in addition to pointing out these archetypal topics, Little Red Riding Hood also symbolizes the awakening of sexuality. Their red clothing testifies to the beginnings of sexual maturity, and the wolf, anthropomorphized to soften the devastating effects of this transit, is perhaps a symbol of wild sex, of primitive sexuality, while the hunter, on the other hand, represents sex within civilization, that is, within a functional marriage to society; whose ultimate goal is to procreate, and not the idle release of the instincts.

These psychological and anthropological interpretations are rigorously true, but behind Little Red Riding Hood lies a perhaps more transcendental motive, and one that exceeds regional considerations on sex and adulthood. If we were to ride on that imaginary time machine, and retrocediésemos further, leaving behind the Middle Ages, we would see that the story of Little Red Riding Hood retains elements of Norse religion, hidden but clearly recognizable by the scholar-and lover of mythology Nordic.

The transition in the belly of an animal is a classic motif. We see it even in the biblical story of Jonah and the whale. The belly is, as we have said, an area of ​​transition, but doubly symbolic, since we all come from a womb and there we will go - the grave, belly of the world. Being swallowed by an animal is a return to intrauterine life, perfect and idealized life, but with a new, allegorical sense, perhaps, for which this new belly nourishes a completely different awakening. Life in the wild womb proposes a latent state, by which the individual will emerge changed. It will no longer be the same, like Little Red Riding Hood, which emerges from the belly of the wolf turned into a woman.

In the Norse narrative of Þrymskviða we see that the giant Þrym steals the hammer of Thor, called Mjolnir, for whose rescue he asks for the hand of the goddess Freyja (whose name is preserved in the word Friday Friday, or Freyja's day). Thor, scandalized, weaves a stratagem: he dresses in Freyja's bridal costume and tricks the giant. The dialogue between Thor and Þryms is textually identical to that of Little Red Riding Hood with the wolf, which throws a diffuse light on the true genital identity of the girl.

Going further back, crossing the dark tides of time, we could say that the story of Little Red Riding Hood also preserves elements of the solar myth. The grandmother represents the sunset, the dying light of twilight devoured by the darkness of the night -the wolf-, and the young woman symbolizes the light of dawn, which emerges from the wolf's belly like the sun that tears the veils of the night. Mythologically speaking, the wolf would be nothing less than Skoll, that huge wolf of the Norse tradition, whose destiny is to devour the sun in the battle of Ragnarok, or Fenrir, that wolf with iron jaws that falls in the apocalypse under the implacable hammer of Thor.

It is curious how mythology is diluted in popular tradition, lost and reborn under a new conception. A gigantic wolf turns into a petty lycanthrope, the God of the Hammer, quick for anger and friendship, becomes a poacher in the forests of France, and the new world, regenerated, free from the harassment of demons and ice giants, it mutates in the delicate and ambiguous forms of a girl, who, like the reddish light of dawn, adorns her head with the color of the rising sky.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

The Bouba Kiki effect

The dark side of psychology is often illuminated by sporadic playful beams. Today we are going to propose to you a small experiment, of course, innocuous; for which we are going to request the collaboration of all the readers.

It is not necessary to really strive; just observe and decide based on a premise. Do you see the image that heads the article? They are two abstract figures without any concrete meaning. The experiment consists in assigning a name to each of them. I am afraid that this exercise there is no space for creativity. I am going to give you two names and you, privately, must decide which name corresponds to each figure.

Which of these figures is Bouba and which is Kiki?

We give them a few seconds to baptize the images with their corresponding names. Remember, there is no right or wrong answer.

Enough? Well, what you have just done is a very brief linguistic-cognitive experiment called the Bouba / Kiki effect, created by the psychologist Wolfgang Köhler in 1929.

This scientist discovered that 95% of the subjects who participated in the experiment assigned the image of the right the name Bouba, and Kiki to the one on the left, although Köhler used the names Baluba and Takete.

That first exercise was carried out in Tenerife, but it was reproduced in many countries, changing slightly the physiognomy of the names; for example, Baluba was also called Bouba and Maluma in experiments performed by the neurologist Vilayanur S. Ramachandran and Edward Hubbard, and Takete was renamed Kiki.

Apparently, the experiments done with English speakers showed an even higher percentage than those practiced with Spanish-speaking people. 98% of the subjects investigated assigned the name Bouba to the rounded shape, and Kiki to the pointy. The conclusion of the experiment suggests that the human brain constructs abstract properties of forms; assigning sharp sounds when they are sharp, while rounded sounds seem to demand softer sounds from our creativity.

The experiment was also reproduced in children of two years, unable to read, with the same results and percentages found in adults.

This simple experiment that they have just done offers a powerful point of investigation for the study of the evolution of language, since it proves that words are never arbitrary, that is to say, that we do not create names and words in a random way, but rather "baptize" "We do an object by using its characteristics and especially the impressions that provoke us.

We might think that in the night of time, when a man (or a woman) tried to communicate with another being using a coherent succession of sounds to which they assigned a particular meaning, it would not really be such an extraordinary event. The truly formidable thing was that his listener, who did not know the rules that his interlocutor had created, managed to understand what he was saying, and above all accepted those sounds as their own and correct.

This acceptance that certain sounds can mean, for example, moon; perhaps it has to do less with a conciliatory agreement than with the recognition of the moon in those same sounds.

Science, at least in this sense, seems to support the foundations of all mythologies. Man never invented words, but "translated" what he saw and felt using his own range of sounds, by the way, finite, but that is never arbitrary and much less random.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Monday 28 January 2019

Art Classical Poetry II

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Sunday 27 January 2019

Art Classical Poetry I

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Tuesday 22 January 2019

"The Swan Lake" 500 Words Story III

Prince Siegfried arrives at his 21st birthday celebration on the palace courtyards to find all of the royal families and townspeople dancing and celebrating, while the young girls are anxiously seeking his attention. During the exquisite celebration, his mother gives him crossbow and informs him that because he is of age now, his marriage will be arranged quickly. Hit with the sudden realization of his future responsibilities, he takes his crossbow and makes up to the woods with his hunting buddies.

Getting ahead of the group, Prince Siegfried finds himself a peaceful spot by an enchanted lake where swans gently float across its surface. While Siegfried watches, I spotted the most beautiful swan with a crown on its head. His buddies soon catch up, but he orders them to leave so he can be by himself. As dusk falls, the swan with the crown turns into the most beautiful young woman he has ever seen. Her name is Odette, the Swan Queen. She informs the young prince that an evil sorcerer, Von Rothbart, who so happened to be disguised as Prince Siegfried's mentor, has turned her and the other girls into swans and that the lake was formed by the tears of their parents' weeping. She tells him that the only way the spell could be broken is if a man, pure in heart, pledges his love to her. The Prince, about to confess his love for her, is quickly interrupted by the evil sorcerer. He takes Odette from Prince Siegfried's embrace and commands all of the swan maidens to dance on the lake and its shore so that the prince can not chase them. Prince Siegfried is left alone on the shore of Swan Lake.

The next day at the formal celebration in the Royal Hall, Prince Siegfried is presented with many prospective princesses. Although the princesses are worthy of his attention, I can not stop thinking about Odette. His mother commands him to choose a bride, but he can not. For the mean time, I have met his mother's request by at least dancing with them. While the prince is dancing, trumpets announce the arrival of Von Rothbart. He brings his daughter, Odile, on whom I have cast spell to appear as Odette. The prince is captivated by her beauty as he dances with the imposter. Unbeknownst to Prince Siegfried, the true Odette is watching him from a window. The prince soon confesses his love to Odile, thinking that she is Odette. To Odette's horror, she flees into the night. Prince Siegfried sees the real Odette fleeing from the window and realizes his mistake. Upon his realization, Von Rothbart reveals to the prince the true appearance of his daughter Odile. Prince Siegfried quickly leaves the party and chases after Odette.

Odette has fled back to the lake and joined the rest of the girls in sadness. Prince Siegfried finds them gathered at the shore consoling each other. I have explained to Odette the trickery of Von Rothbart and she grants him her forgiveness. It is not long before when Von Rothbart and Odile appear in their evil, un-human, somewhat bird like forms. Von Rothbart tells the prince that he must stick to his word and marry his daughter. A fight quickly follows. Prince Siegfried tells Von Rothbart that he would rather be with Odette than to Marry Odile. He then takes Odette's hand and together they jump into the lake. The spell is broken and the remaining swans turn back into humans. They quickly drive Von Rothbart and Odile into the water where they, too, drown. The girls watch the spirits of Prince Siegfried and Odette ascend into the heavens above Swan Lake.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Five Reasons to Push Past your Comfort Zone

If you want to live your purpose, the first thing you should do is leave your comfort zone ...

Although it's, well, comfortable, staying there can squash the dreams of anyone looking to pursue their passion. Especially if you want to succeed independently, choosing comfort over hard work will most certainly land you back in the rat race.

Obviously, it's good to stop once and a while to rest so you do not burn out. Everything has its place and time; but spending too much time resting will effectively prevent you from working hard or succeeding.

The following are five reasons to get out of your comfort zone before it's too late.


1 - Staying comfortable has never gotten anyone from anywhere

This is especially important for independent artists and creators.

If you want to be good enough at your craft for people to support it, you must do it. A lot. Nonstop. It sounds daunting, but if you really enjoy what you do, every second will be worth it.

You'll feel exhausted most of the time, but at least you'll have that energy into something worthy.

At some point, the couch will call your name. Rest will start to sound nice, and you might tell yourself you've earned it by getting as far as you have.

Do not give in. Keep working and improving at your craft, and eventually, you'll be thousands ahead of those who stopped working early every day.

Artist and game developer Lorne Lanning has said that the only people who create truly remarkable things are those who work ridiculously hard every day (and most nights). This is how they create works they know will resonate with people.

If you're willing to push yourself, you can too.


2 - You can discover your gift by leaving your comfort zone

If you're looking for something that can give meaning to your life, the best way to find it is to get up and start searching.

Figure out what ignites that flame in your mind and heart, and instead of settling with the first thing you find, be sure to choose something real, graspable, and meaningful.

Once you have, be careful not to retreat into comfortable territory.

Far from over, the work has just begun ...

Chances are slim you'll find what you love by lying in bed all day or find success with a lackluster effort. Once you know what you want to do, try pouring your heart and soul into it for more than just a few hours.

It'll be difficult, but you'll uncover ideas and inspiration you never thought you had.


3 - Once you're out of your comfort zone, you can use your gift to help people

If you work hard at your craft, you will find at least a few ways you can use it to help others.

You can use financial success to help the less fortunate and show that the world is not all cold-hearted. Or, depending on the level of influence you gain along the way, you can raise awareness of important issues in society.

You can also help those who share your passion.

If you paint, for example, you can teach and inspire new artists in your downtime. If you make videos, you can show new creators how to create quality content and build an audience. Or, that extra time you spend on a painting, video, article, or song might give it the depth and power to reach someone who really needs it.

As we covered (and will cover more later), you'll never know what you can do if you do not try.


4 - Leaving your comfort zone brings a sense of accomplishment

This point is not too exciting, but the sense of accomplishment you feel from being dedicated to what you love is far worth the comfort you sacrifice.

It's the best feeling in the world to not just enjoy something, but to live for it. When you start to accomplish things with it, you'll feel like a superhero.

Dedication brings countless rewards, and if you're 100% onboard, your first few successes will drive you to work harder and achieve more. If you're not, your mind will see success as a reason to stop and relax. This would be the beginning of the end.

Instead of letting it make you lazy, let the "high" you feel from your initial accomplishments drive you to chase your passion vigorously.


5 - You'll never know what you can achieve if you stay comfortable

This is like the second point, but it's worth asking:
Would you regret it if you lived your whole life comfortably, never chasing your dreams like an idealistic madman?
This is a tragic reality for many people, who never do what they love because it's hard work or they convince themselves success is impossible.

Being complacent about your potential for accomplishment is just another way of staying comfortable. Do not be complacent or afraid to struggle. Embrace that struggle and let it drive you.

You only have less than a hundred years on Earth.

• Why not fill them with the most meaningful pursuits possible?

• Why do you accept a life handed to you by some CEO who gets rich from the masses' unwillingness to live for themselves?
Instead of living for the American dream - the comfortable choice - follow your dreams. They matter...

Conclusion

If you love what you do, the work will come naturally.

Striving harder and staying far away from your comfort zone will help, and the more you enjoy what you do, the easier it will be to find inspiration and spend long hours honing your craft.

Staying comfortable will most certainly lead to failure, so no matter how much you love that comfortable space that zaps the potential out of its inhabitants, let go of it and let a life of purpose take its place.

Try to motivate yourself when you would rather rest and remember that the point of all this is to do what you love.


SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Monday 21 January 2019

Cathars - The Pure


Around the year 1,150 some strange bearded missionaries appeared on the roads of the Languedoc, in the South of France ... They used to travel in pairs, dressed in black or navy blue, with a rope girdle.

They preached to the humble in the squares and markets, in the villages and in the cities without avoiding the mansions of nobles or merchants.





They spread a message of love, tolerance and freedom and confessed Christians but rejected the church in Rome.

The Cathar doctrine was much more attractive than the Catholic one who constantly threatened the hell for the most insignificant faults. They were more optimistic and tolerant of human weaknesses ... although they also had certain views of reality that could certainly be criticized. The Cathars (katharoi = "pure") were declared heretics ... they were clear about it.

Pope Innocent III negotiated unsuccessfully with them and consequently organized a crusade of twenty thousand horsemen and forty thousand men who concentrated on Lyon. On July 22 of the year 1,209 they decided to put an end to the components of that group that were in Beziers.

They were assailed by a question that they asked the pope's delegate:

How will we know how to differentiate Catholics from heretics among the population? - "Kill them all, God will already recognize their own..."

The massacres continued in many other places until the year 1243. At that time the Cathars took refuge in the strongholds of the region.

Among them the one of MONTSÉGUR became famous, in the department of Ariège (France). A small castle built on the steep Tabo mountain, at an altitude of 1272 meters. An impregnable position, surrounded by precipices.

In March of 1243 the seneschal of Carcassonne, Huges de Arcis, received the order to end with "the head of the dragon". Some ten thousand men besieged Montségur ... in the end he surrendered. Under the conditions of surrender, the members of the heresy were required to abjure their error in a public act.

215 Catharos refused to do so and were burned in the plain that extends at the foot of the mountain. The place where the great pyre rose is known since then as Campo de los Quemados.

The castle of Montségur has become for half a century the symbol of the resistance, passion and death of the faithful Cathars. Today, it constitutes a point of reference for European esoteric thinking and every year, a crowd of people interested in these issues make a pilgrimage to it.

On the day of the Spring Solstice, the first rays of the sun penetrate through a loophole and leave through the opposite side, crossing the castle. Chance or causality? We have already served the mystery ...

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Saturday 19 January 2019

The Kingdom of Shambhala

In Tibetan Buddhist tradition, Shambhala (or Shambala) is a mystical kingdom hidden somewhere beyond the snow peaks of the Himalayas. It is mentioned in various ancient texts including the Kalachakra and the ancient texts of the Zhang Zhung culture which pre-dated Tibetan Buddhism in western Tibet. The Bon scriptures speak of a closely-related land called Olmolungring.

Shambhala in the Buddhist Kalachakra Teachings

Buddha prophesized that all who received the Kalachakra empowerment would take rebirth in its mandala of consciousness. 

The Kingdom of Shambhala takes a central place in the Kalachakra teachings. Shambhala (Tib. bde ’byung) is a Sanskrit term meaning place of peace/tranquility/happiness. Shakyamuni Buddha is said to have taught the Kalachakra tantra on request of King Suchandra, also the teachings are said to be preserved there. Shambhala is said to be a society where all the inhabitants are enlightened, centered around a capital city called Kalapa. War and injustice are said to be unknown there, and it is said to be peopled by beautiful women and men dwelling in magnificent abodes. 

Shambhala is ruled over by the Kulika or Kalki (Tib. Ridgen) King, a benevolent monarch who upholds the integrity of the Kalachakra tantra. Religious scholars believe that this figure developed out of the myth of the Hindu conqueror Kalki, a similar personage. The Kalachakra prophesizes that when the world declines into war and greed, and all is lost, the twenty fifty Kalika king will emerge from Shambhala with a huge army to vanquish the corrupt world rulers and usher in a worldwide Golden Age. Some scholars put this date at 2424 AD. 

As with many concepts in Vajrayana Buddhism, the idea of Shambhala is said to have an ’outer,’ ’inner,’ and ’secret’ meaning. The outer meaning understands Shambhala to exist as a physical place, although only individuals with the appropriate karma can reach it and experience it as such. There are various ideas about where this society is located, but it is often placed in central Asia, north of Tibet. The inner and secret meanings refer to more subtle understandings of what Shambhala represents, and are generally passed on orally. 

Western Fascination with Shambhala 

During the nineteenth century, Theosophical Society founder H.P. Blavatsky alluded to the Shambhala myth, giving it currency for Western occult enthusiasts. Later esoteric writers further emphasized and elaborated on the concept of a hidden land inhabited by a hidden mystic brotherhood whose members labor for the good of humanity.

The myths of Shambhala were part of the inspiration for the tale of Shangri-La told in the popular book Lost Horizon, and thus some people even refer to Shambhala improperly as if it were a Shangri-La. Shambhala’s location and nature remains a subject of much dispute, and several traditions have arisen as to where it is, or will be, including those that emphasize it as a non-physical realm that one can approach only through the mind.

Ancient Zhang Zhung texts identify Shambhala with the Sutlej Valley in Himachal Pradesh. Mongolians identify Shambala with certain valleys of southern Siberia. Beginning in the 1960s, various occult writers have sought to explain the evil of Nazism by suggesting Adolf Hitler tapped into the malevolent forces of Shambhala when he sent Ahnenerbe researchers to Tibet to measure Tibetan skulls as part of his master race justifications. Also known that Josef Stalin organized an expedition to find Shambala. 

Western Esoteric Traditions 

Madame Blavatsky, who claimed to be in contact with a Great White Lodge of Himalayan Adepts, mentions Shambhala in several places without giving it especially great emphasis. (The Mahatmas, we are told, are also active around Shigatse and Luxor.) Blavatsky’s Shambhala, like the headquarters of the Great White Lodge, is a physical location on our earth, albeit one which can only be penetrated by a worthy aspirant.

Later esoteric writers like Alice Bailey (the Arcane School) and the Roerichs (Agni Yoga) do emphasize Shambhala. Bailey transformed it into a kind of extradimensional or spiritual reality. The Roerichs see its existence as both spiritual and physical. 

Related "hidden land" speculations surrounding the underground kingdom of Agartha led some early twentieth-century occultists to view Shambhala as a source of rather negative manipulation by an evil (or amoral) conspiracy. Nevertheless, the predominant theme is one of light and hope, as evidenced by James Redfield’s and Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche’s respective books by that name. 


In Neo-Nazi mysticism, Shambhala is sometimes supposed to be the place to which Adolf Hitler fled after the fall of the Third Reich. Hitler was known to have an interest in the myth of Shambhala and in "eastern mysticism" generally, from which he appropriated the swastika

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Friday 18 January 2019

"The Eye" Poetry VII

The bright blessed day, the dark sacred night,
No Evil shall escape my sight,
Now I have only one doubt left,
Which of the twain was God?
SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

The Truth about Samson's "Incredible Strength"

We all know the story of Samson and his force, supposedly a guy who was very very powerful in a natural way.

And they also say that his Force took his out of his long hair, and that if it were cut the guy would lose all his strength, all his power.

We know that having long hair does not give you powers like those of Sansón, so here is something very strange.

Being a story with a "mythical" tone, everyone thinks "ahh is a fable of tanntas that there are" or else they will say "maybe it has existed but that sure force was supernatural or some kind of unknown magic" But not...


To start, you have to talk about the semen, the human sperm. It is known that, when a person does not go to bed or have sex for a while, his energy rises greatly.

When we spend time without ejaculation, "something" in us makes us more energetic, more active, with a power, a strange force, an excitement, an impressive sexual energy, and how we are trained to be anxious and are surrounded by provocative women with their clothes, on TV, on the internet, everywhere, the first thing we do is: more.turbar or have sex.

What leads to ejaculation.

When ejaculation we feel dull, tired, exhausted, "something" is gone, "something" that we do not know what is we went out, and although we have the ability to return to have another relationship / masturbation, the power is not the same , a large amount of energy was lost.

So, if the retention of energy gives us energy, and if we lose consciousness, we feel tired and lose energy, it means that the esper.ma has that "something" that we did not know what it was.

It is the Sperm that has that Power, that Energy, that Force.

When we waste the semen, we lose a lot of nutrients that it brings to the body. We lose a lot of very useful cells for our brain, mainly. Also, among other things, it weakens our hair a lot, and also to our spiritual state because when we ejaculate we feel depressed and with a lost look for several moments.

It is Totally Lie, an infernal aberration that they say that to retain the semen "you explode the testicles"; it is an aberration to wisdom, a total fallacy, never could explode any internal organ to retain the semen, on the contrary, the body and brain, mainly, will thank.

Samson had long hair, but this was not the one that gave him his strength, it was his retention of the sperm without spilling it.

And what happened? it was Delilah one night, "she cut his hair" and Sanson lost his strength.

What a coincidence !! And aside, we have to eat that verse? Who grabbed him asleep and stayed? Over night he went to visit him? Boys, Delilah went to seduce and have sex with Samson.

This, by letting himself be seduced, shed his Power, and his strength was gone, his power weakened, his hair weakened.

From there "dalila cut his hair," he did not cut his hair, seduced him, he fell into the trap, fell into the temptation of the ejaculatory orgasm and lost, therefore, all his strength that he kept in his sperm, that I never spilled.

That is, Delilah had Samson "cut" his own hair, but not just cut it, but weaken it.



But of course, this knowledge will never put them in front of the public because it is a Sacred Wisdom.

Semen is a Creative Energy, Sexual Energy is the Greatest Power that Man has, and that must TRANSMIT it with his wife.

hence "do not let me fall into temptation and free us from evil", and from there come so many other things that seem meaningless, but that make a lot of sense and everything fits perfectly.

That's why the government constantly bombards us with pornography, masturbation and sex, I mean: pouring out the Sacred Power to keep us small like a crumb of bread.


It is my duty to let you know this knowledge so that you can improve your physical, mental and spiritual life.

As dalila seduced Sanson, this is how today's society is totally seductive (women) and easily seducible (men), so true love is lost, so the value of friendship is lost (How many friends have betrayed each other ), for this reason the important sexual energy that we have inside our body is lost.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Thursday 17 January 2019

100 reasons why climate change is natural and not man-made

HERE are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the European Foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made:
1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.

3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2 levels.

4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been higher - more than ten times as high.

6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time.

7) The 0.7°C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends. 

8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favorable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.

9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists - in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming

10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.

11) Politicians and activists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago

12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds

13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that,

“fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class - predominantly - are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”.
14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions

15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”

16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.

17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.

18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapour which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control

19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.

20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates

21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades

23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries

24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder

25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research

26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles

27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.

28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population

29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago

30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles

31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming

32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures

33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history - we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere

34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere

35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything

36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes

37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”

38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC

39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally

40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms

41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical

43) Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests

44) The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years

45) The increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution

46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped global populations

47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.

48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.

50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required.

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water - including CO2, calcium, and water - can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics. Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot

55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers. 

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting.

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organization, wrote,

“the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1°C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”
58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country.

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.

60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth. 

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years.

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural.

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialized countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature. 

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events.

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years - so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote:

“The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”
71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all. 

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions.

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes. 

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback - and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO2 by hundreds of years.

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data.

82) Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money - under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors. 

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes.

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change.

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures - in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.

88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years.

89) It is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life.

90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level.

91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen.

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal.

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change skeptic.

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters.

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon.

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said:

“We - along with many of our fellow citizens - are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”
99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated,
“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”
100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded,
“We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.”

 SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!