The Truth about Samson's "Incredible Strength"

We all know the story of Samson and his force, supposedly a guy who was very very powerful in a natural way.

And they also say that his Force took his out of his long hair, and that if it were cut the guy would lose all his strength, all his power.

We know that having long hair does not give you powers like those of Sansón, so here is something very strange.

Being a story with a "mythical" tone, everyone thinks "ahh is a fable of tanntas that there are" or else they will say "maybe it has existed but that sure force was supernatural or some kind of unknown magic" But not...

To start, you have to talk about the semen, the human sperm. It is known that, when a person does not go to bed or have sex for a while, his energy rises greatly.

When we spend time without ejaculation, "something" in us makes us more energetic, more active, with a power, a strange force, an excitement, an impressive sexual energy, and how we are trained to be anxious and are surrounded by provocative women with their clothes, on TV, on the internet, everywhere, the first thing we do is: more.turbar or have sex.

What leads to ejaculation.

When ejaculation we feel dull, tired, exhausted, "something" is gone, "something" that we do not know what is we went out, and although we have the ability to return to have another relationship / masturbation, the power is not the same , a large amount of energy was lost.

So, if the retention of energy gives us energy, and if we lose consciousness, we feel tired and lose energy, it means that the esper.ma has that "something" that we did not know what it was.

It is the Sperm that has that Power, that Energy, that Force.

When we waste the semen, we lose a lot of nutrients that it brings to the body. We lose a lot of very useful cells for our brain, mainly. Also, among other things, it weakens our hair a lot, and also to our spiritual state because when we ejaculate we feel depressed and with a lost look for several moments.

It is Totally Lie, an infernal aberration that they say that to retain the semen "you explode the testicles"; it is an aberration to wisdom, a total fallacy, never could explode any internal organ to retain the semen, on the contrary, the body and brain, mainly, will thank.

Samson had long hair, but this was not the one that gave him his strength, it was his retention of the sperm without spilling it.

And what happened? it was Delilah one night, "she cut his hair" and Sanson lost his strength.

What a coincidence !! And aside, we have to eat that verse? Who grabbed him asleep and stayed? Over night he went to visit him? Boys, Delilah went to seduce and have sex with Samson.

This, by letting himself be seduced, shed his Power, and his strength was gone, his power weakened, his hair weakened.

From there "dalila cut his hair," he did not cut his hair, seduced him, he fell into the trap, fell into the temptation of the ejaculatory orgasm and lost, therefore, all his strength that he kept in his sperm, that I never spilled.

That is, Delilah had Samson "cut" his own hair, but not just cut it, but weaken it.

But of course, this knowledge will never put them in front of the public because it is a Sacred Wisdom.

Semen is a Creative Energy, Sexual Energy is the Greatest Power that Man has, and that must TRANSMIT it with his wife.

hence "do not let me fall into temptation and free us from evil", and from there come so many other things that seem meaningless, but that make a lot of sense and everything fits perfectly.

That's why the government constantly bombards us with pornography, masturbation and sex, I mean: pouring out the Sacred Power to keep us small like a crumb of bread.

It is my duty to let you know this knowledge so that you can improve your physical, mental and spiritual life.

As dalila seduced Sanson, this is how today's society is totally seductive (women) and easily seducible (men), so true love is lost, so the value of friendship is lost (How many friends have betrayed each other ), for this reason the important sexual energy that we have inside our body is lost.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

100 reasons why climate change is natural and not man-made

HERE are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the European Foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made:

1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.

3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO² levels.

4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO² emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO² levels have often been higher - more than ten times as high.

6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time.

7) The 0.7°C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends. 

8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favorable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.

9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists - in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming

10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.

11) Politicians and activists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago

12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO² or clouds

13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that,

“fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class - predominantly - are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”.

14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO² emissions

15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”

16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.

17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.

18) Despite activist concerns over CO² levels, CO² is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapour which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control

19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.

20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates

21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO² concentration in the atmosphere.

22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades

23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries

24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder

25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research

26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles

27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO²-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.

28) Despite activist concerns over CO² levels, rising CO² levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population

29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago

30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles

31) Despite activist concerns over CO² levels, rising CO² levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming

32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures

33) Today’s CO² concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history - we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere

34) It is a myth that CO² is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO² constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere

35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO² increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything

36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes

37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”

38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC

39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally

40) Rising CO² levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms

41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical

43) Rising CO² levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests

44) The historical increase in the air’s CO² content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years

45) The increase of the air’s CO² content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution

46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO² levels has helped global populations

47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.

48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO² emissions were causing climate change

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.

50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required.

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water - including CO², calcium, and water - can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics. Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot

55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers. 

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting.

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organization, wrote,

“the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO² is less than 1°C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”

58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country.

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.

60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth. 

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years.

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20^th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural.

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialized countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO² emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature. 

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events.

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years - so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote:

“The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”

71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all. 

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions.

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes. 

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback - and that increasing CO² is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO² by hundreds of years.

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data.

82) Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money - under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors. 

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes.

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO² change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO² are the cause of past temperature and climate change.

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO² concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures - in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO² concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO² is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.

88) Whilst CO² levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO² content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years.

89) It is a myth that CO² is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO² is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO² is essential to life.

90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level.

91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO² has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen.

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal.

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change skeptic.

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters.

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon.

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said:

“We - along with many of our fellow citizens - are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”

99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated,

“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO², methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded,

“We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.”

 SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Aiwass, the angel of Aleister Crowley

Yes H.P. Lovecraft dreamed of his dark amorous gods, Aleister Crowley saw them personally. Such is the case of Aiwass, an angel who, according to Crowley, dictated to him the controversial Book of the Law (Liber Al vel Legis) on April 8, 9 and 10, 1904.

Aleister Crowley mentions that first he heard a scary voice that said, in impeccable English:

Behold! it is revealed by Aiwass the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat

He then determined that the name corresponded to the Egyptian Har-par-khered, or, in its Greek version, to Harpocrates, who in the extravagant conception of Aleister Crowley would be none other than Horus, the central deity of his cosmogony.

Aiwass introduced himself as a supernatural voice that floated over Aleister Crowley's desk in Cairo, Egypt. Then he moved to his left shoulder and began to dictate from a corner of the room. Its modulation was confused, indeterminate, changing, as the occultist briefly stated in his personal diary:

(of deep timbre, musical and expressive, its tones solemn, voluptuous, tender, fierce or aught else as suited to the moods of the message, Not bass, perhaps a rich tenor or baritone).

Then he composed a drawing of Aiwass quite finished, where it is revealed composed of a fine material, translucent, high; of delicate features. Whenever asked to detail Aiwass's face, Aleister Crowley said that his face was that of a savage king (Savage King), whatever he understood as king or savage.

But Aiwass has nothing to do with the notion of "angel" that any of us could elaborate. The angel of Aleister Crowley is different to all, even to the fallen angels. Overcome by the emotion of believing himself "contacted" by a superior intelligence, Crowley hailed:

The existence of religion presupposes the certainty of some disembodied intelligence, call it God or anything else. And this is exactly what no religion has been able to demonstrate scientifically ... The immense superiority of this particular intelligence, Aiwass, to any other with which humanity has been in conscious communication is revealed not only by the character of the book itself , but by the fact of its absolute understanding of the evidence necessary to demonstrate its own existence and the conditions that govern it.

Later, Aleister Crowley surmises that Aiwass, perhaps, is just a minuscule manifestation of a heavenly power, and identifies him with his own guardian angel or guardian angel.

The interesting thing is that any explanation that falls on Aiwass, be it a vulgar guardian angel, a spirit, or Crowley's own unconscious, his appearance is truly amazing. One of his biographers, Israel Regardie, estimates that it does not matter if Aiwass is an angel or Crowley's unconscious. Both possibilities are, in every rule, supernatural.

Other scholars, such as Sarah Vale or Joshua Gunn, estimate that Aiwass's narrative style is too similar to Aleister Crowley's to be a foreign entity. The most probable and, I repeat, equally amazing, is that Aiwass is Crowley's subjective idealization of his own personality. This often happens at a minuscule level, almost spurious, where we imagine ourselves full of virtues and amazing intellectual qualities. The curious thing is that idealization here takes on a physical form, a voice, a name, and a doctrine.

Moreover, the cabalistic coincidences of the name Aiwass reveal a strong unconscious component in their materializations. For example, typographer Samuel A. Jacobs, who did not know Aleister Crowley personally, wrote him a letter mentioning that his own name, in Hebrew, was written: Shmuel Bar AIWAZ bie Yackou. Intrigued, Crowley asked him how he would write "Aiwass" in Hebrew, to which Jacobs replied polemically: "OIVZ". When doing numbers, Crowley, perplexed, surely jumped from his chair when estimating that this formula equals the number 93, a figure that coincides with the central number of Thelema, the doctrine dictated by Aiwass himself.

The voice and the silhouette of Aiwass were diluted like a dream that we did not finish waking up. Aleister Crowley, who was in fact a remarkable poet, chose the path of analysis and esoteric rationalism to explain the enigmatic mechanisms of his own psyche, perhaps connected with "sensitivities" of a higher order. Other men, perhaps more sensible, connected their terrifying visions with the noblest vehicle we possess to express that which has no positive expression: art. Such is the case of the extravagant visions of William Blake or the gelatinous phantasmagoria of H.P. Lovecraft.

It is worth clarifying that the medium does not modify the end. In other words, it does not matter if we poetize about our visions or candidly consign them as concrete facts, in the end, the stellar winds and gigantic forms that emerge and collapse behind the worlds end up annihilating anyone who dares to observe them directly.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

"Darkness" Poetry VI

Only know i tried my best,

But reality cannot be deceived,

There is no freedom from it all,

And even if i leave and go,

It should have never ended that way,

I believe I m here for no reason,

Nothing to say, 

No words to explain, 

Those who want to live,

Let them fight,

And those who doesn't want to fight,

In this world of eternal struggle,

Do not deserve to live.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

The most "dangerous" zodiac signs according to the FBI

According to the Daily Occupation site, the FBI has shared the dates of birth of killers and people who show psychopathic tendencies.

It is clear that the sign is not responsible for its decisions, but we can not deny that it is quite fun to analyze this data. Check out:

12.-Gemini

Everyone talks badly about the Gemini, but according to the FBI, it is the least dangerous sign.

Since they do not take anyone seriously enough to kill them or harm them, the Geminis end up committing fewer crimes than the rest of the signs.

11.-Aquarium

They worry a lot about justice and have strong egos, although they do not easily lose control.

Probably because of this, it is the second sign - after Gemini - that less appears among psychopaths.

Or, maybe, they're not caught, because they're smart enough to leave no evidence.

10.-Leo

As the saying goes, dog that barks does not bite. And is that, according to the information of the FBI, when a lion commits a murder, it is almost always to attract attention.

9.-Libra

Now you can start worrying about the indecision of the people in this sign. Despite being known as fair, kind and patient, they commit more murders than the previous signs.

Thus, we know that patience has a limit.

It is likely that the pounds develop their own violence when others take advantage of their good intentions.

8.-Virgo

The data say that Virgos are more prone to theft and fraud than to murders, but when they commit them, it is something millimeter-calculated. Typical of virgo.

7.-Pisces

Do you think that pisces are cute, pure love and tenderness? Well, you're wrong, John Wayne Gacy (also known as Killer Clown - The Killer Clown), Richard Ramirez and Aileen Wuornos are some of the most famous serial killers, and they are Pisces.

People born under the sign of Pisces generally commit more murders because of their tendency to addiction.

6.-Capricorn

Although they are known for respecting the laws and regulations, it seems that it is better not to bother the Capricorn.

People born under the sign of Capricorn do not kill often, but when they do, they seem to be quite cruel.

5.-Aries

His anger is abrupt, but it does not last long. That's why we see Aries in 5th place on this list.

If you make an Aries mad, be sure to get away for a while, until things calm down.

4.-Taurus

Taurus's anger is intense. Although people under this sign commit more fraud than murder.

3.-Sagittarius

Ted Bundy, Pablo Escobar and Stalin: all Sagittarius.

People of this sign usually commit felonies, kill en masse and recognize themselves as "leaders".

2.-Scorpio

Since most serial killers were born in November, most are Scorpio or Sagittarius. Thus, they are known to be sadistic murderers.

1.-Cancer

Surprisingly, the most loving of the zodiac appear in the first place, which is that they usually kill because of jealousy. Their changes of humor and extreme sensitivity seem to take them, constantly, to the limit!

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

"The Bird" Poetry V

With eyes upraised,

As one inspired,

Hence ,all you vain delights,

As short as are the nights,

An atmosphere of sorrow,

The sounds of a winter's night,

Naked woods and meadows,

A grateful mind.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!

Sleeping Beauty: The true story

Sleeping Beauty is one of those popular stories we all know... or maybe not.

First let's draw a summary of the story, and then go into details:

A Queen gives birth to a girl. The King announces a great party. Seven fairies are summoned to be godmothers of the girl. In gratitude for the honor (and for the gifts of the king) the fairies give the girl seven gifts.

1. Be the most beautiful of all women.
2. Have the kindness of an angel.
3. The grace of the gazelles.
4. Dance with perfection.
5. Sing like birds.
6. Play all the instruments with mastery.
7. A great intelligence.

Suddenly, an evil fairy enters the room. Furious at not being invited to the party, she curses the girl saying:

-The day of your fifteenth birthday you will pierce yourself with a needle and you will die!

One of the good fairies says:

-The girl will not die, she will sleep a hundred years and a prince will wake her up.

Spend time. When the girl turns fifteen she finds an old woman sewing in a castle room; is the evil fairy who by this stratagem makes the young woman prick her finger with a needle, and sleeps. The King, despondent, sends to call the good fairy, who says:

- So that your pain is not immense; and so that the princess is not alone, they will all sleep, and they will not wake up until their long sleep ends.

Everyone sleeps a huge nap. A magical forest covers the castle. A hundred years pass and a prince goes through the place. Your horse refuses to move forward. As if by magic, see the castle and enter. Find the princess and, excited by her beauty, kisses her gently and the young girl awakens, as well as the rest of the sleepers. The next day the festivities begin with the marriage between the princess and her savior.

Now the true story of Sleeping Beauty:

Before being a fairy tale, Sleeping Beauty was a medieval folktale, heir to an even darker and grander past. In 1697, Charles Perrault published it as: The Sleeping Beauty of the Forest (Belle au Bois Dormant). Years later, after deep folklore investigations, the Grimm brothers republished the story, this time in Germany, under the title: Sleeping Beauty (Dornröschen).

These are the versions that circulate normally, and on which the imaginary of the story was built -including Disney and its inexhaustible capacity to annihilate traditional monuments-. They are similar in almost everything, except in the number of fairies. The Brothers Grimm smoothed the story to give it the charm of simplicity, Perrault, however, uses the story to rant against women and give free rein to their machismo. For example, he insists that the prince makes fun of the princess' old clothes, and includes intelligence as one of the gifts offered by the fairies, as if this could only exist supernaturally in the woman. Then he feeds on the prince's mother, a kind of insatiable ogre who tries to devour the children of the young couple. Grimm, much more subtle, eliminate the gift of intelligence, and clarify on several occasions that the princess already had it.

The truth is that, despite the efforts of the brothers Grimm not to be sexist, the medieval version of Sleeping Beauty tells us about a rather stupid princess. Read out of a mythological context, the curse of the fairy is only understandable in terms of profound misogyny. Let us suppose that someone sends us a similar curse, that is to say, that in a little while we will fall into a dream of a century after piercing us with a needle. The most reasonable thing is that we stay away from such textile tools, but this does not happen in the story. Even the king, wise and prudent man, is scandalized by the prophecy, which he considers perfectly achievable. It is worth noting that in the middle ages, and much more here, the woman was intimately related to the preparation and maintenance of the clothes, so there was always a needle at hand for them. In this sense, the fear of the king is doubly unusual, because he knows that his daughter, as a woman, is obliged to do the textile tasks, but it never occurs to her to abandon them, a fact that would leave her safe from the curse.

Soon we will see that all these anecdotes have survived for the simple fact that they have a strong mythological roots. They are not there in vain, nor is their usefulness merely narrative; They are there because they are the only link to the true story of Sleeping Beauty.

Let's travel from the bedrooms of romantic and Victorian girls, and, why not, the young girls of our time, and fly to the remote past of Western Europe. Let's go through the middle ages, which we imagine covered by a dark cloud (and equally bright), we pass over the Beowulf, English monument to the ancient mythology of that country, lost forever, let's leave behind the first Merovingian and all the kings of the continent ; let's go back, far in time, long before Galileo climbs to the tree; let us immerse ourselves in an archaic darkness, when the Lords of Valhalla were still feared and worshiped by the Indo-European tribes; Then yes, there we will find the reason that a seemingly imbecile tale survives in our era; illuminating the hidden essence of Sleeping Beauty.

Our link to that dark age is the Volsunga Saga (Völsungasaga), written in Iceland in the thirteenth century on stories that predate the Roman boom, and that go back, perhaps, to 800 BC, when the so-called Völkerwanderung occurred (migration of villages); a time of changes and exiles, where entire civilizations migrated throughout Europe. Among other notable stories, the Volsunga Saga tells the story of Sigurd (Sigurðr) and Brunilda (Brynhildr), whose foundations are even before migrations, in a time as old as 1000 a.C.

Brunhilda was a Valkyrie, that is, a demigoddess who gathered the dead heroes on the battlefield, escorting them to the wide halls of Valhalla. She is, by all accounts, the woman in the wild, honorable and terrible at the same time. Its ambiguous silhouette will star in Nordic epics like Nibelungenlied, and it would inspire Richard Wagner in his capital work: The Ring of the Nibelungs (Der Ring des Nibelungen). The Volsunga Saga tells that Odin, the great Norse god, orders Brunilda to decide on the fate of a battle between two kings, Agnar and Hjalmgunnar. She decides for Agnar, and Odin, enraged by not having bent down to her favorite, Hjalmgunnar, the condemnation to an eternal dream, that is, to let go of her goddess status and live in the thick world of the senses. In other words, Odin condemns Brunilda to live like a mortal woman, and imprisons her on Mount Hindarfjall, hidden in the Alps. To do this he nails it to the hard floor of a cave using fire needles.

Sigurd, a gentleman of noble lineage, discovers the entrance to a dark cavern in that mountain, and describes it as a castle of rock surrounded by a thick forest. There he finds Brunhilda, seized by a dream so deep that, at first, our hero considers her dead; although he knows that he is not. His king, Gunnar, has told him the tragedy of Brunhilda, and has sent him on a suicide mission, get the hand of this fallen Valkyrie. For this, Sigurd disguises himself with Gunnar's clothes, since Brunilda will only marry anyone who can defeat her in single combat. The young man wakes her with a kiss on the cheek, a detail that some point out as metaphorical, holding that this kiss was, in reality, a brush with the edge of his sword; and they intertwine in a fierce battle.

Sigurd wins. Brunhilda meekly surrenders to her destination, but before returning they must spend the night in the cave, as a strong storm hits the flanks of Hindarfjall. They lie together, but Sigurd places his sword between them, so their bodies do not touch. He remains faithful to his promise to the king; but Brunhilda, dazzled by the strength of the young man, tries to caress him and cuts a finger with the sword, whose manufacture was so perfect that its tip was as tiny and sharp as the tip of a pin.

Recognizing these mythological shreds is not simple, nor is it particularly necessary to enjoy a good story; but its weight is what decides the immortality of a popular story. Perhaps we do not know why, nor how or when, but all the stories that still entertain our children have an amazing past, something that enters through the ears but flourishes in the unconscious, which branches out in the vast psychological inheritance of the peoples, oblivious to the vicissitudes of the cinema and the changes, immobile, like the dream of some princesses, fixed, like the sharp gaze of the princes who wander through forests already forgotten.

SEARCH YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE

We await your comments and suggestions, until the next post, have a nice day!